[1]朱超林,孙育,黄玉婷,等.医护患协同护理模式对肿瘤患者PICC围置管期的影响[J].西部中医药,2021,34(02):117-121.[doi:10.12174/j.issn.2096-9600.2021.02.32]
 ZHU Chaolin,SUN Yu,HUANG Yuting,et al.Study on the Influence of Doctor-patient Collaborative Nursing Mode on Cancer Patients with PICC in Applying Canula Period[J].Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2021,34(02):117-121.[doi:10.12174/j.issn.2096-9600.2021.02.32]
点击复制

医护患协同护理模式对肿瘤患者PICC围置管期的影响
分享到:

《西部中医药》[ISSN:2096-9600/CN:62-1204/R]

卷:
34
期数:
2021年02期
页码:
117-121
栏目:
出版日期:
2021-02-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on the Influence of Doctor-patient Collaborative Nursing Mode on Cancer Patients with PICC in Applying Canula Period
作者:
朱超林, 孙育, 黄玉婷, 曾永蕾
安徽中医药大学第二附属医院,安徽 合肥 230061
Author(s):
ZHU Chaolin, SUN Yu, HUANG Yuting, ZENG Yonglei
Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei 230061, China
关键词:
经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管协同护理模式肿瘤并发症心理状态自我护理能力生活质量
Keywords:
PICCcollaborative nursing modetumorcomplicationspsychological functionself-care agencyquality of life
分类号:
R248.9
DOI:
10.12174/j.issn.2096-9600.2021.02.32
摘要:
目的探讨医护患协同护理模式对肿瘤患者经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管(peripherlly inserted central catheter,PICC)围置管期的影响。 方法选取肿瘤患者82例,利用随机数字表法分为对照组与观察组,每组41例。对照组围置管期进行常规护理干预,观察组围置管期在对照组护理基础上运用医护患协同护理模式进行护理干预,对比分析两组围置管期护理效果。 结果置管并发症发生率和置管意外事件发生率观察组分别为4.88%(2/41)、2.44%(1/41),对照组分别为21.95%(9/41)、14.63%(6/41),观察组均显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。干预后观察组焦虑自评量表(self-rating anxiety scale,SAS)与抑郁自评量表(self-rating depression scale,SDS)评分显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。干预后观察组中文版自我护理能力测定量表(exercise of self-care agency scale,ESCA)中自我护理技能、自我护理责任感、自我概念、健康知识水平评分和生活质量综合评定量表(generic quality of life inventory-74,GQOLI-74)中物质生活、躯体功能、心理功能、社会功能、总体评价评分均显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。 结论医护患协同护理模式在肿瘤患者PICC围置管期的应用效果良好。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo explore the influence of doctor-patients collaborative nursing mode on cancer patients with PICC in applying canula period. MethodsAll 82 patients were chosen and allocated to the control group and the observation group according to random number table method, 41 cases each group, the control group accepted conventional nursing intervention in applying canula period, and the observation group doctor-patients collaborative nursing mode based on the therapy the control group received, to compare and analyze nursing effects in applying canula period between both groups. ResultsThe incidences of catheter complications and catheter accidents in the observation group were 4.88% (2/41) and 2.44% (1/41), lower than 21.95% (9/41) and 14.63%(6/41) of the control group notably (P<0.05). The observation group was lower than the control group remarkably in SAS and SDS scores after the intervention (P<0.05). The observation group was higher than the control group in the scores of self-care skills, self-care responsibility, self-concept and health education level in ESCA, the scores of material life, somatic function, psychological function, social function and total evaluation in GQOLI-74 notably (P<0.05). ConclusionThe application values of doctor-patients collaborative nursing mode are good for cancer patients with PICC in applying canula period.

相似文献/References:

[1]朱竹华,顾菊凤,姚洪芳,等.协同护理模式对胃癌术后化疗患者心理健康和自我护理能力的影响[J].西部中医药,2014,27(12):115.
[2]李凡丽.协同护理模式在急诊科管道护理中的应用[J].西部中医药,2016,29(03):129.
 LI Fanli.Application of Collaborative Care Model to Tube Nursing in the Emergency Department[J].Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2016,29(02):129.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
朱超林(1979—),女,本科,主管护师。研究方向:静脉治疗及肿瘤护理。安徽省十三五医疗卫生重点专科建设项目[皖卫科教(2017)30号];安徽中医药大学临床科研项目(2017lcky013)
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-02-15