[1]王雅平,沈澍农△.俄藏《孙真人千金方》残页与新雕本比较研究[J].西部中医药,2016,29(04):63-66.
WANG Yaping,SHEN Shunong.Comparative Study between Remained SunZhenRen QianJinFang Collected in Russia and the New Carvings[J].Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2016,29(04):63-66.
点击复制
俄藏《孙真人千金方》残页与新雕本比较研究(
)
《西部中医药》[ISSN:2096-9600/CN:62-1204/R]
- 卷:
-
29
- 期数:
-
2016年04期
- 页码:
-
63-66
- 栏目:
-
- 出版日期:
-
2016-04-15
文章信息/Info
- Title:
-
Comparative Study between Remained SunZhenRen QianJinFang Collected in Russia and the New Carvings
- 文章编号:
-
1004-6852(2016)04-0063-04
- 作者:
-
王雅平，沈澍农△
-
南京中医药大学，江苏 南京 210023
- Author(s):
-
WANG Yaping, SHEN Shunong△
-
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China
-
- 关键词:
-
孙真人千金方; 新雕孙真人千金方; 比较研究; 敦煌学
- Keywords:
-
SunZhenRen QianJinFang; new carved SunZhenRen QianJinFang; comparative study; DunHuang study
- 分类号:
-
R229
- 摘要:
-
以俄藏TK166残页为中心，与日藏《新雕孙真人千金方》进行比较，对两者在药物剂量、计量单位、药物剂量繁简字、药物名称方面的差异进行了统计分析；对俄藏TK166残页的刊刻年代进行了考证分析；就两者的成书年代先后问题展开探讨，推测俄藏本的刊刻年代应在新雕本之后。
- Abstract:
-
TK166 residue collected in Russia was compared with new carved SunZhenRen QianJinFang collected in Japan, the differences between both in the dosage of the herbs, measurement units, unsimplified and simplified characters of herbal dosages, herbal names were statistically analyzed; the printing years of TK166 residue collected in Russia were analyzed and tested; the problem of which book published early was discussed, and it was concluded that the printing year of TK166 residue collected in Russia was later than the new carved SunZhenRen QianJinFang.
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
-
收稿日期：2015-10-22作者简介：王雅平(1989—)，女，硕士研究生。研究方向：中医医史文献。△通讯作者：沈澍农(1956—），男，教授，博士研究生导师。研究方向：中医医史文献及敦煌学研究。
更新日期/Last Update:
2016-04-15