[1]王丽,叶方立.柠檬冰刺激结合低频电刺激治疗脑卒中后吞咽功能障碍疗效观察[J].西部中医药,2020,33(05):131-135.[doi:10.12174/j.issn.1004-6852.2020.05.37]
 WANG Li,YE Fangli.Observation on Curative Effects of Lemone Ice Stimulation in Combination with Low Frequency Electrical Stimulation in the Treatment of SD after Stroke[J].Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2020,33(05):131-135.[doi:10.12174/j.issn.1004-6852.2020.05.37]
点击复制

柠檬冰刺激结合低频电刺激治疗脑卒中后吞咽功能障碍疗效观察
分享到:

《西部中医药》[ISSN:2096-9600/CN:62-1204/R]

卷:
33
期数:
2020年05期
页码:
131-135
栏目:
出版日期:
2020-05-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Observation on Curative Effects of Lemone Ice Stimulation in Combination with Low Frequency Electrical Stimulation in the Treatment of SD after Stroke
文章编号:
1004-6852(2020)05-0131-05
作者:
王丽叶方立
1 上海中冶医院,上海 200941; 2 武汉科技大学医学院
Author(s):
WANG Li12, YE Fangli 2
1 Shanghai Zhongye Hospital, Shanghai 200941, China;2 Medical College, Wuhan University of Science and Technology
关键词:
脑卒中吞咽功能障碍柠檬冰刺激低频电刺激临床疗效安全性
Keywords:
stroke swallowing dysfunction lemon ice stimulation low frequency electrical stimulation clinical effects safety
分类号:
R743
DOI:
10.12174/j.issn.1004-6852.2020.05.37
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
目的:观察柠檬冰刺激结合低频电刺激治疗脑卒中后吞咽功能障碍的治疗效果以及安全性。方法:将脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者120例根据随机数字表原则分为4组,每组30例。对照组患者采用常规治疗,治疗1组在对照组基础上联合柠檬冰刺激,治疗2组在对照组基础上联合低频电刺激,治疗3组患者在对照组基础上联合柠檬冰刺激和低频电刺激。比较4组患者治疗前后功能性经口摄食量表(functional oral intake scale,FOIS)评级、视频透视吞咽检查(video fluoroscopic swallowing study,VFSS)评分、洼田饮水试验(water swallow test,WST)评级、吞咽肌障碍评分及不良反应。结果:治疗后4组患者FOIS及WST评级均优于治疗前,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗1组、2组及3组患者FOIS评级、WST评级优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗3组患者FOIS评级、WST评级优于治疗1组、2组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗1组与治疗2组患者FOIS评级、WST评级比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后4组患者VFSS评分、吞咽肌障碍评分均高于治疗前,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗1组、2组及3组患者VFSS评分、吞咽肌障碍评分高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗3组患者VFSS评分、吞咽肌障碍评分高于治疗1组、2组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗1组与治疗2组患者VFSS评分、吞咽肌障碍评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。4组间不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:柠檬冰刺激和低频电刺激均可有效改善脑卒中后吞咽功能障碍患者吞咽功能,但二者联合应用疗效更优,并且安全性与两者单用相当。
Abstract:
Objective: To analyze the therapeutic effect and safety of lemon ice stimulation combined with low frequency electrical stimulation in the treatment of swallowing dysfunction(SD) after stroke. Methods: A total of 120 patients with SD after stroke were divided into four groups according to the principle of random number table, 30 cases each group. The control group used conventional therapy, the treatment group No. 1 accepted lemon ice stimulation based on the treatment the control group accepted, the treatment group No.2 low frequency electrical stimulation on the foundation of the treatment the control group accepted, and the treatment group No.3 both stimulation therapies. To compare FOIS grade, VFSS scores, WST rate, dysphagia score and adverse reactions between four groups before and after treating. Results: After treating, FQIS and WST grades of four groups were superior to these before treating, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). FQIS and WST grades of the treatment groups of NO.1, 2 and 3 were better than these of the control group, and the difference had statistical meaning (P<0.05). FQIS and WST grades of the treatment groups NO. 3 were better than these of the treatment groups of NO. 1 and 2, and the difference had statistical meaning (P<0.05). The difference had no statistical meaning in FQIS and WST grades between the treatment groups of No.1 and 2 (P>0.05). After treating, VFSS scores and dysphagia scores of the four groups were higehr than these before treating, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). VFSS scores and dysphagia scores of the treatment group NO. 3 were higher than these of the treatment groups of NO. 1 and 2, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The difference showed no statistical meaning in VFSS and dysphagia scores between the treatment groups of NO. 1 and 2(P>0.05). The difference showed no statistical meaning in the incidence of adverse reaction between four groups(P>0.05). Conclusion: Lemon ice stimulation combined with low frequency electrical stimulation could effectively improve swallowing function of the patients, their combination possess better clinical effects and they present similar safety.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘智斌,牛晓梅,王 渊,等.针刺“新膀胱俞”穴治疗脑卒中后尿潴留疗效观察[J].西部中医药,2013,26(01):100.
 LIU Zhibin,NIU Xiaomei,WANG Yuan,et al.Observation on Therapeutic Effects of Needling“Xin PangGuang Shu"[J].Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2013,26(05):100.
[2]李西兄.早期康复介入对急性脑卒中偏瘫患者运动功能的影响[J].西部中医药,2013,26(07):107.
 LI Xixiong.Effects of Early Rehabilitation Intervention on Motor Function of Hemiplegic Patients with Acute Cerebral Apoplexy[J].Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2013,26(05):107.
[3]王莉,唐春莲,杨冬梅△.脑卒中患者多重耐药菌感染调查与护理干预[J].西部中医药,2014,27(11):138.
[4]陆霞,石志敏.顺时养生护理措施对脑卒中患者日常生活活动能力的影响[J].西部中医药,2015,28(02):113.
[5]杨春林,巩婷,李清花,等.基于子午流注研究时间护理模式在缺血性脑卒中偏瘫患者康复中的应用[J].西部中医药,2015,28(05):124.
[6]赵红梅,李宝娥,贺艳霞,等.护理干预在脑卒中后吞咽障碍治疗中的应用价值[J].西部中医药,2015,28(06):133.[doi:2015/6/16 0:00:00]
[7]杨琦先,梁程,黄学宽.强肾活血疗法联合拜阿司匹林治疗急性缺血性脑卒中40例[J].西部中医药,2015,28(08):106.
[8]张晓凌,毛忠南.脑卒中后肩手综合征中西医治疗现状[J].西部中医药,2015,28(08):180.
[9]张成新,艾则孜·木沙江.中西医结合卒中单元模式对维、汉两民族急性脑卒中患者血脂、血清内脂素和脂联素的影响[J].西部中医药,2015,28(10):1.
[10]张中华.正交实验优选归芪无糖颗粒剂的水提工艺[J].西部中医药,2015,28(10):56.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-10-20作者简介:王丽(1984—),女,硕士学位,主治医师。研究方向:康复医学。△通讯作者:叶立方(1955—),男,教授。研究方向:流行病学。
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-05-15