[1]张永国,郭晓娟.丁螺环酮与醒脑开窍针刺法治疗强迫症的疗效对比[J].西部中医药,2017,30(02):98-99.
 ZHANG Yongguo,GUO Xiaojuan.Effects Comparison on Buspirone and Activating Brain and Regaining Consciousness Acupuncture in Treating Obsessive-compulsive Disorder[J].Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2017,30(02):98-99.
点击复制

丁螺环酮与醒脑开窍针刺法治疗强迫症的疗效对比()
分享到:

《西部中医药》[ISSN:2096-9600/CN:62-1204/R]

卷:
30
期数:
2017年02期
页码:
98-99
栏目:
出版日期:
2017-02-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects Comparison on Buspirone and Activating Brain and Regaining Consciousness Acupuncture in Treating Obsessive-compulsive Disorder
文章编号:
1004-6852(2017)02-0098-02
作者:
张永国1郭晓娟2
1 汉中市城固县中医医院精神卫生分院,陕西 汉中 723200; 2 陕西省精神卫生中心临床心理三科
Author(s):
ZHANG Yongguo1, GUO Xiaojuan2
1 Mental Health Branch, the Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Chenggu County, Hanzhou 723200, China; 2 Clinical Psychological Third Department of Shaanxi Mental Health Center
关键词:
强迫症丁螺环酮醒脑开窍针刺法
Keywords:
obsessive-compulsive disorder buspirone activating brain and regaining
分类号:
R749.9
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
目的:对比丁螺环酮与醒脑开窍针刺法治疗强迫症的临床疗效。方法:将120例患者随机分为观察组、对照组各60例。观察组采用醒脑开窍针刺法进行治疗,对照组口服丁螺环酮,观察2组治疗前后汉密顿焦虑量表(HAMA)和耶鲁布朗强迫量表(Y-BOCS)评分,以及临床疗效及不良反应发生情况。结果:HAMA及Y-BOCS评分2治疗后均明显降低(P<0.05),治疗后2组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。总有效率观察组为85.00%,对照组为81.67%,2组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组未见不良反应发生,对照组不良反应发生率15.00%,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:醒脑开窍针刺法治疗强迫症临床疗效显著,且未见不良反应。
Abstract:
Objective: To compare the clinical effects of buspirone and activating brain and regaining consciousness acupuncture in treating obsessive-compulsive disorder. Methods: 120 patients were randomly divided into the observation group and the comtrol group, each group were 60 cases. The observation group was given activating brain and regaining consciousness acupuncture, the control group were given buspirone. HAMA, Y-BOCS scores, clinical effects and adverse reaction occurrence conditions were observed before and after treatment in both groups. Results: HAMA, and Y-BOCS scores decreased obviously after treatment in both groups(P<0.05), there were no statistical differences between two groups after treatment(P>0.05). The total effective rate in the observation group was 85.00%, the control group was 81.67%, there was no statistical difference(P>0.05). No adverse reaction in the observation group, the adverse reaction rate in the control group was 15.00%, there was staitsitcal difference(P<0.05). Conclusion: Activating brain and regaining consciousness acupuncture in treating obsessive-compulsive disorder has significant clinical effects, and no adverse reactions.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2016-10-24作者简介:张永国(1966—),男,副主任医师。研究方向:精神病的临床诊治。
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-02-15