[1]黄义纯,谭本仁,李晓华,等.土茯苓与红色木质土茯苓的鉴别与研究[J].西部中医药,2024,37(05):20-23.[doi:10.12174/j.issn.2096-9600.2024.05.03]
　HUANG Yichun,TAN Benren,LI Xiaohua,et al.Identification and Study of Tufuling and Red Woody Tufuling[J].Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2024,37(05):20-23.[doi:10.12174/j.issn.2096-9600.2024.05.03]
点击复制

土茯苓与红色木质土茯苓的鉴别与研究
分享到：

《西部中医药》[ISSN:2096-9600/CN:62-1204/R]

卷:
37
期数:
2024年05期
页码:
20-23
栏目:
质量分析
出版日期:
2024-05-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Identification and Study of Tufuling and Red Woody Tufuling
作者:
黄义纯1, 谭本仁2, 李晓华2, 陈华龙1, 肖斌1, 赖颖强2, 徐晓梅2
1.韶关市食品药品检验所，广东 韶关 512028
2.汕头大学医学院附属粤北人民医院，广东 韶关 512026
Author(s):
HUANG Yichun1, TAN Benren2, LI Xiaohua2, CHEN Hualong1, XIAO Bin1, LAI Yingqiang2, XU Xiaomei2
1.Shaoguang Institute for Food and Drug Control, Shaoguang 512028, China
2.Yuebei People's Hospital Affiliated to Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguang 512026, China
关键词:
土茯苓; 红色木质土茯苓; 显微鉴别; 薄层色谱; 高效液相色谱法
Keywords:
red woody; microscopic identification; thin-layer chromatography; high performance liquid chromatography
分类号:
R282.5
DOI:
10.12174/j.issn.2096-9600.2024.05.03
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的对比土茯苓与红色木质土茯苓的性状和显微鉴别、薄层色谱、红外图谱及高效液相色谱指纹图谱，分析二者质量差异。 方法观察两种土茯苓性状鉴别、横切面鉴别、水试鉴别、粉末显微鉴别及薄层色谱、红外色谱，并采用HPLC法测定落新妇苷含量。 结果土茯苓与红色木质土茯苓的性状和显微鉴别有明显不同；水试鉴别显示土茯苓水溶液始终透明，红色木质土茯苓水溶液始终浑浊不透明；两者薄层色谱、红外图谱及高效液相色谱指纹图谱均存在明显差异。 结论土茯苓断面色泽深，淀粉粒较少，水浸液黏性稍差，落新妇苷含量较高，与红色木质土茯苓比较差异显著，本研究结果对土茯苓质量评价有一定参考作用。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo analyze the quality difference between Tufuling (smilacis glabrae rhizoma) and red woody Tufuling by comparing the character, microscopic identification, TLC, infrared chromatography and HPLC fingerprint. MethodsThe character identification, cross section identification, water test identification, powder microscopic identification, TLC, infrared chromatography of two kinds of the herbs were observed, and HPLC was adopted to detect the contents of astilbin. ResultsThe property and microscopic identification of Tufuling and red woody Tufuling were noticeably different; the water test identification showed that the aqueous solution of Tufuling was always transparent, while the aqueous solution of red woody Tufuling was always turbid and opaque; the differences existed in TLC, infrared chromatography and HPLC fingerprint of both drugs. ConclusionTufuling section had a darker colour, fewer starch grains, slightly lower viscosity of water infusion and higher content of astilbin, which were significantly different from each other and were useful as references for the quality evaluation of Tufuling.

相似文献/References:

[1]张肖建,董璐萌,高晗,等.土茯苓配方颗粒水提液HPLC特征图谱研究[J].西部中医药,2021,34(01):20.[doi:10.12174/j.issn.2096-9600.2021.01.05]
　ZHANG Xiaojian,DONG Lumeng,GAO Han,et al.Study on Fingerprint of Water Extract of Tufuling Dispensing Granules by HPLC[J].Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2021,34(05):20.[doi:10.12174/j.issn.2096-9600.2021.01.05]
[2]王玉天,朱跃兰,席雅婧.基于网络药理学探讨“土茯苓-川牛膝”药对治疗痛风性关节炎的作用机制[J].西部中医药,2023,36(06):54.[doi:10.12174/j.issn.2096-9600.2023.06.13]
　WANG Yutian,ZHU Yuelan,XI Yajing.The Mechanism of Treating Gouty Arthritis with Couple Medicines of "Tufuling-Chuanniuxi" Based on Network Pharmacology[J].Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2023,36(05):54.[doi:10.12174/j.issn.2096-9600.2023.06.13]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
黄义纯（1975—），男，主管药师。研究方向：中药检验分析。2020年度广东省中医药局科研项目（20202195）。
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-05-15