[1]罗镇科,曾婧纯,佘雅琳,等.基于CONSORT声明和STRICTA指南评估针灸治疗带状疱疹的随机对照研究的报告质量[J].西部中医药,2022,35(10):74-79.[doi:10.12174/j.issn.2096-9600.2022.10.15]
　LUO Zhenke,ZENG Jingchun,SHE Yalin,et al.Quality Evaluation of the Report of RCTs on Acupuncture Therapy for Herpes Zoster Based on CONSORT Statements and STRICTA Guidelines[J].Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2022,35(10):74-79.[doi:10.12174/j.issn.2096-9600.2022.10.15]
点击复制

基于CONSORT声明和STRICTA指南评估针灸治疗带状疱疹的随机对照研究的报告质量
分享到：

《西部中医药》[ISSN:2096-9600/CN:62-1204/R]

卷:
35
期数:
2022年10期
页码:
74-79
栏目:
出版日期:
2022-10-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Quality Evaluation of the Report of RCTs on Acupuncture Therapy for Herpes Zoster Based on CONSORT Statements and STRICTA Guidelines
作者:
罗镇科1, 曾婧纯2, 佘雅琳1, 王澍欣2, 许纪超1, 林国华2
1.广州中医药大学第一临床医学院，广东 广州 510405
2.广州中医药大学第一附属医院康复中心
Author(s):
LUO Zhenke1, ZENG Jingchun2, SHE Yalin1, WANG Shuxin2, XU Jichao1, LIN Guohua2
1.The First Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine
2.Rehabilitation Center The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine
关键词:
带状疱疹; 针灸疗法; 随机对照研究; 方法学质量评价; 报告质量
Keywords:
herpes zoster; acupuncture therapy; RCTs; methodological quality assessment; reporting quality
分类号:
R246.7
DOI:
10.12174/j.issn.2096-9600.2022.10.15
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的评价不同针灸疗法治疗带状疱疹随机对照研究（randomized controlled trial，RCTs）的报告质量及方法学现状，探讨提高该领域临床试验报告质量的方法。 方法计算机检索MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane Library、中国知网（China national knowledge infrastructure， CNKI）、万方、维普等数据库（检索时限为建库至2019年12月31日）。由两名研究者独立进行文献筛选和资料提取，采用Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具及CONSORT 2010声明、STRICTA标准进行方法学及报告质量的评价。 结果共纳入RCTs49篇。参照CONSORT声明对RCTs进行质量报告，42个RCT（85.71%）详细描述了受试者符合纳入标准，全部研究描述了准确的干预措施。随机序列产生方法、分配隐藏、盲法、基线完整性、样本量估算及研究方案注册的报告率分别为40.82%、6.12%、2.04%、14.29%、0、0。根据STRICTA标准对针灸干预措施进行评价，针灸理论依据、针灸施加其他干预措施的细节、治疗师背景报告率分别为100%、87.75%、0%。结局指标的总疗效、皮疹消退时间、疼痛VAS评分、后遗神经痛发生率及安全性评价的报告率依次为89.80%、28.57%、28.57%、12.24%、6.12%。Cochrane偏倚风险评估发现全部RCTs在盲法及选择性报告方面有未知风险，另有18个RCT（36.73%）在随机方法、3个RCT（6.12%）在分配方案隐藏提示为低偏倚风险。 结论目前针灸治疗带状疱疹的临床研究质量普遍较低，但针灸细节的详细描述对临床医生在针灸干预的实施上具有参考意义。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo assess the quality of the reports of RCTs on different acupuncture therapies for herpes zoster (HZ) and the current status of methodology, and explore the methods of improving the quality of clinical trial reporting in the field. MethodsDatabases including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and others were searched by computer, and the retrieval limit was between database-building and December 31, 2019. Two researchers independently conducted literarure screening and data extraction, Cochrane bias risk assessment tool, CONSORT 2010 statement, STRICTA guideline were used to evaluate the quality of methodology and the reporting. ResultsAltogether 49 RCTs were included. RCTs were reported according to CONSORT statement, 42 RCTs (85.71%) described in details that the subjects met the inclusion standard, all the studies showed the accurate intervention measures. The report rates of random sequences generation method, allocation concealment, blind method, baseline integrity, sample size estimation and study protocol registration were 40.82%, 6.12%, 2.04%, 14.29%, 0 and 0 respectively. Acupuncture intervention measures were assessed according to STRICTA standard, the reporting rates of theoretical basis of acupuncture, the details of acupuncture plus other intervention measures, the background of therapists were 100%, 87.75% and 0% respectively. The report rates of overall clinical effects of outcome indicators, disappearing time of rash, VAS scores, the incidence of postherpetic neuralgia and safety evaluation were 89.80%, 28.57%, 28.57%, 12.24% and 6.12% successively. Cochrane bias risk assessment found that all RCTs have unknown risks in blind and selective reporting, the other 18 RCTs (36.73%) showed low biased risk in randomized method, and other three RCTs (6.12%) in allocation concealment. ConclusionCurrently, clinical studies on acupuncture in the treatment of HZ are in low quality, while the detailed description of acupuncture could serve as the reference for the doctors' implementation of acupuncture intervention.

相似文献/References:

[1]徐彦龙,徐秀梅.《针灸甲乙经》治疗腰痛特点分析*[J].西部中医药,2013,26(12):33.
　XU Yanlong,XU Xiumei.Analysis on Therapeutic Features of Lumbago in A- B Classic of Acupuncture and Moxibustion[J].Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2013,26(10):33.
[2]关亚珍,指导：张洪涛.“矩阵针法”治疗失眠的理论与临床应用研究[J].西部中医药,2013,26(10):70.
　GUAN Yazhen,DirectorZHANG Hongtao.Study on Clinical Application and Theory of “Matrix Acupuncture” in Treating Insomnia[J].Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2013,26(10):70.
[3]陈玲芸,陈 强.313 例火针治疗带状疱疹患者护理体会[J].西部中医药,2014,27(08):146.
[4]赖雪燕,张嘉玲,祁冀,等.针灸治疗肩周炎的临床研究文献计量学分析*[J].西部中医药,2014,27(09):65.
[5]缪奇祥,杨运宽.杨介宾教授针灸治疗面瘫经验撷萃[J].西部中医药,2015,28(04):51.
[6]赖雪燕,叶敏,祁冀,等.针灸治疗肩周炎的三大特色选穴方法*[J].西部中医药,2014,27(06):71.
　LAI Xueyan,YE Min,QI Ji,et al.On Three Kinds of Characteristic Points Selection Methods for Treating Scapulohumeral Periarthritis by Acupuncture[J].Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2014,27(10):71.
[7]赵小红.激光照射联合中药治疗带状疱疹30例疗效观察[J].西部中医药,2013,26(02):77.
　ZHAO Xiaohong.Observation on Therapeutic Effects of Laser Radiation and TCM in Treating 30 Cases of Herpes Zoster[J].Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2013,26(10):77.
[8]陈强,陈芸玲.火针高密度点刺法治疗带状疱疹313例[J].西部中医药,2013,26(09):100.
　CHEN Qiang,CHEN Yunling.High Density Pricking with Fire Needle for 313 Patients Suffering from Herpes Zoster[J].Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2013,26(10):100.
[9]李正军,李淑玲,指导：刘国安.刘国安教授中西医结合内调外治带状疱疹经验[J].西部中医药,2016,29(04):44.
　LI Zhengjun,LI Shuling,Director: LIU Guoan.Professor Liu Guoan′s Experience of Treating Herpes Zoster by Internal Regulation and External Treatment with Integrative Medicine[J].Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2016,29(10):44.
[10]于莹,杨海昊,黄海量,等.中药治疗带状疱疹的用药规律分析[J].西部中医药,2017,30(01):54.
　YU Ying,YANG Haihao,HUANG Hailiang,et al.Clinical Medication Rule of Chinese Materia Medica in Treating Herpes Zoster[J].Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2017,30(10):54.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
罗镇科（1995—），男，硕士学位。研究方向：痛症的针灸治疗。国家自然基金面上项目（81574061）；广东省省级科技计划项目（2017A020213019）；广东省科学技术厅项目（2017A020213019）。
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-10-15